The State Bar of Texas Construction Law Section
search
email
Home Members Section Newsletters Conferences Neutrals resources
  Featured Article  



Full Text
Adobe PDF Format


Download
Word
format

Need help downloading?



THE TEXAS CONTRACT DISPUTES PROCESS: CONTESTED CASE PROCEDURES

15th Annual Construction Law Conference

February 14 & 15, 2002

San Antonio, Texas

George C. Baldwin

Lloyd, Gosselink, Blevins, Rochelle, Baldwin & Townsend, P.C.
Austin, Texas




Table of Contents

  1. THE INITIAL LEGISLATION
    • WHO MAY AVAIL THEMSELVES TO THIS CHAPTER
    • WHO IS EXCLUDED FROM THIS CHAPTER
    • NEGOTIATION PROCEDURE
    • CONTESTED CASE HEARING
    • WHEN WILL THIS PROCEDURE APPLY?

Abstract

The 1999 Texas Legislature enacted a procedure that is designed to process contractor claims against state agencies arising from state contracts, including construction contracts but excluding Department of Transportation contracts. The legislature acted following a series of court decisions, both in the Texas Supreme Court and in various Courts of Appeals, that threatened the state's long-standing reliance on the doctrine of sovereign immunity to protect itself from contract claims. Immediately after the legislature acted, the Austin Courts of Appeals reached similar determinations in four cases, permitting contractors that had completed their performance but not been paid in full to litigate against state agencies. Prior to the enactment of this legislation, and subject to these cases, a contractor with a contract or breach of contract claim had two alternatives: it could file suit in District Court and battle the state's claim the it is immune from suit or it could petition the legislature for permission to sue the state. Neither option typically afforded the aggrieved claimant much relief. Since 1999, the Supreme Court decided the cases of Texas Department of Transportation v. Aer-Aerotron, Inc., 39 S.W.3d 220 (Tex. 2001) and General Services Commission v. Little-Tex Insulation Company, Inc., 39 S.W.3d 591 (Tex. 2001). These cases make clear that an aggrieved contractor's only remedy lies in the contested case proceeding.




Full Text Adobe PDF Format

You must have the free Adobe Acrobat Reader 4.0 (or greater) installed in your computer in order to view or print this paper. It is available as a free download from the Adobe Web site. If you do not have Acrobat Reader installed, click the link to the left to download it. If a menu window opens before the paper, choose the "View" option.




home | members | section | newsletters | conferences | neutrals | resources
search | what's new | email


Questions or Comments? Give us feedback.
© 1998-2004 The State Bar of Texas Construction Law Section


Problems with the site?
Contact  webmaster@constlaw.org


Last updated 15 November 2002