The State Bar of Texas Construction Law Section
search
email
Home Members Section Newsletters Conferences Neutrals resources
  Featured Article  

Full Text
Adobe PDF Format



Download
Word
format

Need help downloading?



ETHICAL PROBLEMS WITH JOINT REPRESENTATION

16th Annual Construction Law Conference

March 6 & 7, 2003

Dallas, Texas

Martha Crandall Coleman

Strasburger & Price, L.L.P.
Dallas, Texas




Table of Contents

  1. INTRODUCTION
  2. THE ETHICAL STANDARDS
  3. CONSIDERATIONS BEFORE ACCEPTING JOINT REPRESENTATION
    1. Competent and Diligent Counsel
    2. Loyalty
    3. Provide Reasonable Information
    4. No Disclosure of Confidential Information
    5. Avoid a Conflict of Interest
    6. Continuing analysis
    7. Subsequent Dispute
    8. Checklist
  4. CASE STUDY
    1. The Framework Of The Surety-Principal Relationship
      1. A performance bond
      2. A payment bond
    2. The Tendered Defense
    3. Potential Problems With Joint Representation
      1. Handling Performance Bond Claims
      2. Handling Payment Bond Claims
      3. Handling a Case in Litigation
    4. Settlement Discussions
    5. Cross-action by Surety Against Indemnitors
    6. Principal Defended by Insurer
    7. Potential Problems With Retaining Separate Counsel
    8. Conclusion of Case Study
  5. CONCLUSION

Abstract

Lawyers are occasionally asked to represent two parties in the same transaction. The request is frequently made when the potential clients see no reason to hire two lawyers and want to "just get the deal done." The potential clients are rarely adverse when the request is made and the lawyer is often encouraged to think that nothing could ever drive the potential clients apart.

The problem for the lawyer and the clients arises when the deal "goes bad" or some other dispute arises between the parties. The lawyer often ends up in the middle of a mess - one that could have been avoided or minimized by actions taken at the beginning of the representation.

This paper will first discuss the ethical standards that apply when a lawyer decides whether he or she should undertake a joint representation. It will then comment on the issues that must be considered by the lawyer before he can make a well-informed decision. Finally, it will illustrate the issues that arise by analyzing a hypothetical request to represent both a principal and a surety in a payment bond dispute.




Full Text Adobe PDF Format

This paper is available as a benefitof membership to Construction Law Section members. If you are already a member, just use one of the links above and enter your username and password when prompted. Here's how to join Construction Law Section and gain access to this material.

You must have the free Adobe Acrobat Reader 4.0 (or greater) installed in your computer in order to view or print this paper. It is available as free download from the Adobe Web site. If you do not have Acrobat Reader installed, click the link to the left to download it. If menu window opens before the paper, choose the "View" option.




home | members | section | newsletters | conferences | neutrals | resources
search | what's new | email


Questions or Comments? Give us feedback.
© 1998-2004 The State Bar of Texas Construction Law Section


Problems with the site?
Contact  webmaster@constlaw.org


Last updated 29 January 2004