Table of Contents
- Introduction
- Binding Arbitration
- Architect/Engineer - Decision Clauses
- Compelling Arbitration under the Texas General Arbtration Act
- Common Law Arbitration
- Compelling Arbitration under the Federal Arbitration Act
- Scope of the Arbitration Clause
- The Waiver of the Right to Arbitrate
- Procedural Aspects of Arbitration
- Selection of Arbitrators
- The Hearing Location
- Discovery
- Hearing Procedures
- Joinder / Consolidation
- Enforcing the Arbitration Award
- Texas General Arbitration Act
- United States Arbitration Act
- Non-Binding Dispute Resolution Techniques
- The 1987 Alternate Dispute Resolution Act
- Mediation
- Moderated Settlement Conference
- Non-Binding Arbitration
- Non-Binding Trial Techniques
Attachment 1: Order of Referral for Mediation
Attachment 2: Rules for Mediation
Attachment 3: Attorney's Information Sheet and Request for Mediation
Abstract
The modern party to a construction lawsuit is often times faced
with interminable delays and expense in order to get his case to the
Courthouse. Once the case is tried, a litigant's expectations may
be further frustrated by the fact that the fact finder is not
familiarwiththeintricaciesofconstructionpractice. Inaneffort
to avoid the above circumstances, many contractors and their counsel
are giving serious consideration to alternative methods of resolving
their disputes. Generally speaking, the alternatives include
arbitration, mediation and mini trials.
The increasing use of alternative dispute resolution seems
mandated by the overwhelming congestion facing federal and state
courts.
Alternative methods may be binding or non-binding depending on
the agreementofthe parties. Generally, a Texas construction lawyer
will deal with binding arbitration provisions in a construction
contract or will face a non-binding method suggested by the court
once a dispute has reached the courthouse. Sections II, III and IV
of this paper assume that there is a binding arbitration clause in
the construction contract.
|