OVERVIEW OF PREFERENCES
- PREFERENCES DEFINED
DEFENSES
- ORDINARY COURSE OF BUSINESS
- CONTEMPORANEOUS EXCHANGE FOR NEW VALUE
- SUBSEQUENT NEW VALUE DEFENSE
- ALL OTHER STATUTORY DEFENSES
- OTHER NON-TRADITIONAL DEFENSES
- HOW TO AVOID PREFERENCES
- CONSISTENT POLICIES AND ACCURATE RECORD KEEPING
- GO COD OR COO
- THIRD-PARTY GUARANTIES
- ASSIGNMENT OF CONTRACT PROCEEDS
- RECLAMATION
Abstract
Any company extending unsecured credit to its customers is likely, at some
point in its business life, to face preference demands and lawsuits under the Bankruptcy
Code. Preference claims customarily arrive as a demand to repay amounts the creditor
received from its customer in the ninety (90) days before the customer's bankruptcy case and
are sometimes followed by a lawsuit in a bankruptcy court called an adversary proceeding.
To many creditors, preference claims come as a surprise. The notion of
debtors suing creditors to recover payments made on bona fide debts seems both unfair and
unreasonable. The primary underlying principle supporting the return of preferential
payments is the fair and equal treatment of all unsecured creditors. According to that
principle, creditors of equal priority should receive pro rata shares of the debtor's
property. See Begier v. IRS, 496 U.S. 53,58 (1990). A second underlying principle
is discouraging creditors from racing to the courthouse to dismember the debtor during its
slide into bankruptcy.
Preferential transfers under federal bankruptcy law are generally defined
in 1 1 USC 3 547(b). In order to successfully prosecute a cause of action to avoid a
preferential transfer, a debtor (or bankruptcy trustee) must clear five hurdles.