The State Bar of Texas Construction Law Section
search
email
Home Members Section Newsletters Conferences Neutrals resources
  Featured Article  

Full Text
Adobe PDF Format



Download
Word
format

Need help downloading?



SUBCONTRACT GUIDANCE FOR THE SUBCONTRACTOR:
Achieving Consensus Without Absorbing All the Risks

18th Annual Construction Law Conference

March 3 & 4, 2005

San Antonio, Texas

John W. Nassen

FORD NASSEN & BALDWIN P.C.
Dallas, Texas




TABLE OF CONTENTS

INTRODUCTION

THE CONTRACTING PROCESS

TYPES OF SUBCONTRACTS

SPECIFIC CONTRACT CLAUSES
Flow-Through
Scheduling
No Damage for Delay
Changes
Comprehensive Lien Waivers
Periodic Lien Releases
Contingent Payment
Stop-Work
Indemnity
Insurance
Termination for Convenience
Dispute Resolution

CONCLUSION

ABSTRACT

Over the past few decades, the role of the subcontractor has expanded. Today few prime contractors self-perform significant portions of their contract work, instead opting to serve as a broker between the owner and those subcontractors actually carrying out the construction. In practice, most prime contractors function in the capacity of at-risk construction managers. As subcontractors are now called upon to accept more project responsibility, they are also expected to bear a greater percentage of the associated risk. Some prime contractors actually attempt to transfer all of the project risks onto their subcontractors, in effect removing the “at-risk” from the construction manager moniker.

Of course, shifting some of the risk to the subcontractor makes sense. Because subcontractors perform most, if not all, of the work, they are in a better position to control many of the performance risks. And, with the increasing sophistication and risk aversion of institutional owners, prime contractors are also compelled to accept more onerous obligations under the prime contract. It is not surprising that prime contractors venture to pass these obligations through to their subcontractors.

While successful subcontractors have grown in terms of contract volume and per contract price, many have not adjusted their business and contracting practices to appropriately deal with the increased responsibility and risk. Some are ill equipped to effectively negotiate fair and balanced subcontract agreements. While many prime contractors engage legal counsel to assist with the process, this practice is still considered a luxury across much of the subcontracting industry. With subcontractors frequently entering into multi-million dollar subcontracts, the attendant level of exposure warrants consultation with legal counsel at some level to ensure that the subcontractor is adequately protected.

This paper provides guidance to the construction lawyer in assisting the subcontractor with this process. As discussed more fully below, this undertaking can be difficult given the subcontractor’s relative bargaining position. However, even minor revisions to otherwise overreaching subcontracts can be the difference between a successful subcontractor and one that fails by taking on too much responsibility or risk on a given project.




Full Text Adobe PDF Format

This paper is available as a benefit of membership to Construction Law Section members. If you are already a member, just use one of the links above and enter your username and password when prompted. Here's how to join Construction Law Section and gain access to this material.

You must have the free Adobe Acrobat Reader 4.0 (or greater) installed in your computer in order to view or print this paper. It is available as free download from the Adobe Web site. If you do not have Acrobat Reader installed, click the link to the left to download it. If menu window opens before the paper, choose the "View" option.




home | members | section | newsletters | conferences | neutrals | resources
search | what's new | email


Questions or Comments? Give us feedback.
© 1998-2004 The State Bar of Texas Construction Law Section


Problems with the site?
Contact  webmaster@constlaw.org


Last updated 30 May 2006