 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Featured Article
|
|
 |

 Download
WordPerfect
format
Need help downloading?
|
I DON'T CARE WHAT THE CONTRACT SAYS,
I DESERVE MONEY FOR DELAY.....
JUST ASK MY EXPERT!
Annual Meeting
Construction Law Section
State Bar of Texas
June 11, 1999
Ft. Worth, Texas
DONALD O. PRATT
PAUL H. SANDERFORD
Pratt & Sanderford, P. C.
2221 E. Lamar Blvd., Suite 150
Arlington, Texas 76006
Telephone: 817/633-2200
Telecopier: 817/633-6188
www.prattsanderford.com
|
 |
 |
Table of Contents
- Applicability of the No Damage for Delay Clause
- Introduction
- Recognized Exceptions
- Texas Law
- Use of Construction Experts After Daubert and Robinson
- Introduction
- William Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.509 U. S. 579, 113 S. Ct. 2786, 125 L.Ed.2d 469 (1993).
- Daubert Comes To Texas
- Daubert/Robinson Expands To All Expert Testimony
- The Construction Expert: What To Look Out For
- The Future of Daubert/Robinson and the Construction Expert
|
 |
 |
Abstract
Recovery of delay damages is fraught with numerous stumbling blocks. The two major hurdles
which must be overcome are usually (1) getting around a "No Damage for Delay" clause, i.e.
entitlement and (2) proof of the actual delay and damages flowing therefrom. The second hurdle
must be overcome with the use of the "Expert" witness. This paper will discuss the exceptions to
the No Damage for Delay provisions under Texas law and application of the Daubert case to
construction "experts".
|
 |
 |
You must have the free Adobe Acrobat Reader 4.0 (or greater) installed in your
computer in order to view or print this paper. It is available as a free
download from the Adobe Web site. If you do not have Acrobat Reader installed,
click the link to the left to download it. If a menu window opens before the paper, choose the "View"
option.
|