The State Bar of Texas Construction Law Section
search
email
Home Members Section Newsletters Conferences Neutrals resources
  Featured Article  



Full Text
Adobe PDF Format


Download
Word
format

Need help downloading?



DESIGN/BUILD -- PUBLIC PROCUREMENT ISSUES

10th Annual Construction Law Conference

February 20 & 21, 1997

Austin, Texas

Terry L. Salazar, Esq.

FORD YUNGBLUT WHITE & SALAZAR, P.C.
Dallas, Texas




TABLE OF CONTENTS

I. INTRODUCTION 1
II. DESIGN/BUILD CONTRACTING IS INCOMPATIBLE WITH COMPETITIVE BIDDING 2
    A. Texas Attorney General Opinion No. JM-1 189 2
    B. Professional Services Procurement Act 3
    C. Preparations of Plans and Specifications for Public Works in Texas 5
    D. Competitive Bidding Requires Prior Preparation of Detailed Plans and Specifications 7

III. LIMITED AUTHORIZATION FOR DESIGN/BUILD CONTRACTS BY PUBLIC OWNERS 8
    A. County Jail Facilities S
    B. Municipal Jail Facilities 9
    C. TDCJ secure detention facilities 10
    D. Institution of Higher Education Energy Conservation Projects 11
    E. Regional Transportation Authonties 12

IV. DESIGN/BUILD CONTRACTS FOR PUBLIC SCHOOL DISTRICTS 12
V. PAYMENT AND PERFORMANCE BONDS FOR DESIGN/BUILD PROJECTS. 13
VI. DESIGN/BUILD ON FEDERAL PROJECTS 14

Abstract

The traditional method for contracting for the construction of public works in Texas is to have separate contracts for the design and construction of the public work. Under the design contract, detailed plans and specifications are prepared by the design professional and then these documents are used as the basis for using competitive bidding to award the separate construction contract to a single prime contractor or multiple prime contractors. Under the design/build method of contracting, the public owner awards a single contract to the design/builder to design and construct the public work. Thus, the design/builder undertakes responsibility for both the design and construction of the project.

Advocates of design/build contracting for construction projects claim that the design/build method offers distinct advantages over the traditional method of awarding separated contracts for the design and construction of a project.

Until recently, public owners in Texas were not permitted to utilize the design/build approach for construction of public works. In the last decade, t1~ Texas Legislature has granted some limited autnoriry to various governmental entities to deviate from the traditional method of awarding separate contracts for the design and construction of a public project. In 1995, with the passage of Senate Bill No. 1 ("SB 1"), the Texas Legislature granted public school districts broad authority to use the design/build method of contracting for construction of a public work. This paper will review the statutory provisions which act as a general bar to the use of design/build contracting for most governmental entities and then it will examine the nature of the limited grants of authority to use design/build contracts for public works construction.




Full Text Adobe PDF Format

You must have the free Adobe Acrobat Reader 4.0 (or greater) installed in your computer in order to view or print this paper. It is available as a free download from the Adobe Web site. If you do not have Acrobat Reader installed, click the link to the left to download it. If a menu window opens before the paper, choose the "View" option.




home | members | section | newsletters | conferences | neutrals | resources
search | what's new | email


Questions or Comments? Give us feedback.
© 1998-2004 The State Bar of Texas Construction Law Section


Problems with the site?
Contact  webmaster@constlaw.org


Last updated 6 June 2001