![]() |
||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
||||||||||||||
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|||||||||||
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
![]() |
Featured Article | ||||||||||||||||
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||
|
OVERCOMING OBSTACLES TO INSURANCE COVERAGE FOR CONSTRUCTION DEFECTS18th Annual Construction Law ConferenceMarch 3 & 4, 2005San Antonio, TexasPatrick J. WielinskiCokinos, Bosien & Young
|
|||||||||||||||||
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Appendices AbstractAsk any general contractor, subcontractor, and particularly any residential contractor. Insurance coverage for defective construction has been constricting steadily over the past several years. Two sources of constriction of coverage are the subject of this paper. The first limitation is the result of efforts by the insurance industry to amend the policy to eliminate or limit coverage for risks that are perceived to be difficult or impossible to underwrite. The second type of limitation is imposed through interpretation of the policy language by the courts. |
|||||||||||||||||
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
|
|||||||||||||||||
![]() Last updated May 24, 2006 |